AI Regulations Tracker

Every AI and algorithmic decision-making regulation XIRA tracks, organized by state. Updated as new laws are signed.

Tracking 99 regulations across 24 states and jurisdictions. Every entry verified against enrolled statute text. Last updated April 9, 2026.

Compare AI regulations between states

Pick two states to compare obligations, timing, and enforcement exposure.

Signal: compare totals, in-effect counts, and highest state penalty side by side.

Texas has 16 regulations while California has 31. Texas requires Data retention limits that California does not. California requires AI detection tool required, Content provenance required, Right to human review that Texas does not. Both states require Prohibited practices, Transparency notice required, Consent required.

Summary statsTexasCalifornia
Total regulations1631
AI-specific laws519
Sector-specific laws01
Privacy ADM laws11
Highest state penalty$200,000$1,000,000
Already in effect1529
Upcoming12

Federal penalties also apply: up to $53,088 per violation (FTC). These apply in every state in addition to state-level penalties above.

ObligationTXCA
ADM impact assessment required
AI detection tool required
Bias testing required
Consent required
Consumer notification required
Consumer opt-out required
Content provenance required
Content removal required
Data access rights
Data retention limits
Disclosure to users required
Impact assessment required
Incident reporting required
Profiling disclosure required
Prohibited practices
Record-keeping required
Reporting required
Right to human review
Risk management program required
Safety protocols required
Transparency notice required

Texas

California

This comparison shows the regulatory landscape. Your actual obligations depend on which AI tools you use and whether you build or deploy AI. Run a free scan with your specific details.

Scan your exposure

Popular comparisons

Find which regulations apply to you.

Start your free scan

Free. No account required.

or

Get monthly regulatory updates