XIRA

Compare AI Regulations by State

Select two states to compare their AI regulations side by side. Colorado and California load by default so you can explore right away.

Iowa has 12 regulations while California has 32. Iowa requires no unique obligations that California does not. California requires ai detection tool, content provenance, Consumer opt-out required that Iowa does not. Both states require Prohibited practices, Bias testing required, Record-keeping required.

Summary statsIowaCalifornia
Total regulations1232
AI-specific laws219
Sector-specific laws02
Privacy ADM laws01
Highest state penaltySee individual regulations$1,000,000
Already in effect1130
Upcoming12

Federal penalties also apply: up to $53,088 per violation (FTC). These apply in every state in addition to state-level penalties above.

ObligationIACA
ADM impact assessment required●
ai detection tool●
Bias testing required●●
Consent required●
Consumer notification required●●
Consumer opt-out required●
content provenance●
content removal●●
Data access rights●
Disclosure to users required●●
Impact assessment required●●
Incident reporting required●
Profiling disclosure required●
Prohibited practices●●
Record-keeping required●●
reporting●
Right to human review●
Risk management program required●●
safety protocols●
Transparency notice required●●

Iowa

California

This comparison shows the regulatory landscape. Your actual obligations depend on which AI tools you use and whether you build or deploy AI. Run a free scan with your specific details.

Scan your exposure

Popular comparisons

Colorado vs CaliforniaNew York vs IllinoisTexas vs CaliforniaColorado vs Connecticut