Tracking 99 regulations across 24 states and jurisdictions. Updated April 20, 2026.

AI Regulations Tracker

Every AI and automated decision-making regulation XIRA tracks, organized by state. Every entry verified against enrolled statute text.

Regulation catalog

Database snapshot. 99 regulations, 24 jurisdictions. Updated April 20, 2026.

California

(4 tracked)

CaliforniaIn Effect
California Transparency in Frontier AI Act (SB 53)
Requires developers of frontier AI models trained above the statutory compute threshold (10^26 FLOPs) to publish safety frameworks, report critical safety incidents to the Office of Emergency Services, and implement whistleblower protections. Also reaches large frontier developers with annual revenues over $500 million. Replaces the vetoed SB 1047 with a narrower transparency approach. Currently applies to approximately five to eight companies worldwide given the FLOP threshold. Includes a federal deference provision: compliance with comparable federal standards, including the EU AI Act, is accepted where the statute allows.
Effective January 1, 2026Risk weight 8
CaliforniaUpcoming
California AI Transparency Act (SB 942)
The California AI Transparency Act requires creators of large generative AI systems to provide free AI detection tools, embed provenance metadata in AI-generated content, and offer visible disclosure options. Large platforms must detect and preserve provenance data.
Effective August 2, 2026Risk weight 6
CaliforniaIn Effect
California AI Training Data Transparency Act (AB 2013)
Requires developers of generative AI systems or services available to Californians to publish high-level documentation on training data, including sources, types, and curation. Applies retroactively to systems released on or after January 1, 2022. No trade secret exemption. Internal development or material modification of third-party GenAI can be in scope. xAI challenged the law in federal court; on March 4, 2026 the court denied a preliminary injunction, so AB 2013 remains in full effect while litigation continues. Major providers published required documentation by January 1, 2026.
Effective January 1, 2026Risk weight 6
CaliforniaIn Effect
California Healthcare Provider Generative AI Disclosure (AB 3030)
Requires healthcare providers to disclose when generative AI is used in patient interactions and to document that use in the patient record. Focuses on licensed providers and clinical settings. AB 489 (2025) later extended parallel transparency duties to developers and deployers of healthcare AI, not only providers.
Effective January 1, 2025Risk weight 5

New York

(1 tracked)

New YorkUpcoming
New York Responsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act, S6953B/A6453B)
New York's RAISE Act regulates frontier AI model developers. Requires publication of a frontier AI framework, quarterly confidential risk assessment filings with the DFS Office, transparency reports, 72-hour incident reporting, and registration with the DFS Office of Frontier AI Model Developer Transparency and Reporting. Applies to developers with $500M+ revenue operating models above 10^26 FLOP. Chapter amendment (S8828) signed March 2026 is the final version.
Effective January 1, 2027Risk weight 7

Rhode Island

(1 tracked)

Rhode IslandIn Effect
Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act - ADM provisions
Rhode Island's privacy framework includes consumer rights tied to profiling and automated decisions, including opt-out and disclosure obligations. Opt-out limited to solely automated decisions. However, Rhode Island defines profiling broadly: human oversight and input into the outcome does not remove processing from the definition of profiling (broader than most states).
Effective January 1, 2026Risk weight 7

Washington

(1 tracked)

WashingtonUpcoming
Washington AI Content Disclosure Act (HB 1170)
AI content provenance and watermarking requirements for providers with 1 million or more monthly Washington users. Requires latent disclosures (watermarks) in AI-generated image, video, and audio content. Extended implementation period to January 1, 2028. Only applies to providers with 1 million or more monthly Washington users. Closely aligned with California SB 942 (California AI Transparency Act). AG-exclusive enforcement under the Consumer Protection Act. No private right of action.
Effective January 1, 2028Risk weight 5

Federal

(1 tracked)

Federal (DOL)In Effect
DOL AI in Workplace Guidance
Non-binding principles for AI in the workplace covering transparency, human oversight, informed consent, data protection, non-discrimination, worker voice, and compliance with existing labor law. Issued under Biden DOL. Status under Trump administration uncertain. However, underlying labor law obligations persist.
Effective May 16, 2024Risk weight 2

99Regulations tracked

24Jurisdictions

87In effect

OnePath from scan to export

Numbers reflect the live catalog and site configuration.

See the match before you commit

Lead with the scan. Add a work email only if you want updates. Nothing here blocks the free exposure path.

Regulation catalog

California Transparency in Frontier AI Act (SB 53)

California AI Transparency Act (SB 942)

California AI Training Data Transparency Act (AB 2013)

California Healthcare Provider Generative AI Disclosure (AB 3030)

New York Responsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act, S6953B/A6453B)

Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act - ADM provisions

Washington AI Content Disclosure Act (HB 1170)

DOL AI in Workplace Guidance

See the match before you commit